Test
Case Issue to Resolve Bank Charges Debate |
FThe Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is taking a case to the
High Court to decide whether or not the level of unauthorised
overdraft charges made by banks are legal. According to the
OFT, tens of thousands of complaints that these charges are
unfair have been received by the County Courts and the Financial
Ombudsman Service.
The debate considers whether, under current consumer law,
it is lawful for banks to charge a penalty for unauthorised
overdrafts and ‘bounced cheques’ in excess of
the administrative costs needed to process them. In many
cases, these penalties can be £30 or more for each
transaction which occurs whilst an individual’s bank
account is in the red. Consumer groups argue that the actual
administrative costs involved are a fraction of the penalties.
As a result of high profile campaigns by consumer groups,
thousands of dissatisfied bank customers have been sending
their banks letters of complaint demanding refunds. Some
banks have settled out of court rather than reveal the actual
cost of dealing with overdrafts and bounced cheques.
There have been several cases where the courts have found
in favour of the bank which has left the question of bank
charges unresolved. The OFT has entered into an agreement
with eight leading high street banks to bring a test case
to the High Court to resolve the legal issues.
Until the case is settled, decisions on all existing and
future claims for refunds are likely to be put on hold. Estimates
for when a case might be brought before the High Court range
from November 2007 to early spring 2008.
Internet Link:
OFT website
|